A Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment, Second Edition ยท Korkman, Kirk & Kemp (2007) ยท Ages 3โ16
โ ๏ธ
School psychologist collaboration required. The NEPSY-II is a neuropsychological instrument that should be administered and interpreted with school psychologist oversight. This reference is provided as a shared knowledge tool for cross-disciplinary FIE collaboration. All NEPSY-II narrative language should be reviewed by the school psych before inclusion in a final FIE report.
Score Classification System
Scaled Score
Percentile Rank
Classification
13โ19
>75th
Above Expected Level
8โ12
26โ75th
At Expected Level
6โ7
11โ25th
Borderline
4โ5
3โ10th
Below Expected Level
1โ3
โค2nd
Well Below Expected Level
Note: The NEPSY-II yields no global composite score. All interpretation is at the domain and subtest level. Primary, Process, Contrast, and Behavioral Observation scores are available; only primary scaled scores are entered in the report starter. When performance is in the lower ranges, language such as "has some difficulties,""has difficulties," or "has great difficulties" on a task may be more parent-friendly than classification labels alone.
Domains & Subtests
Subtest
Abbr
Ages
What It Measures
Animal Sorting
AS
7โ16
Concept formation, self-initiated categorization, and cognitive flexibility. Child sorts cards into two groups using self-generated criteria. Measures initiation, cognitive flexibility, and self-monitoring.
Auditory Attention
AA
5โ16
Selective auditory attention and vigilance. Child touches a target circle when hearing target words in a series. Part 1 of a two-part subtest.
Response Set
RS
7โ16
Shift and maintain a new response set; inhibition and working memory. Part 2 of Auditory Attention โ requires responding to matching OR contrasting stimuli.
Clocks
CL
7โ16
Planning, organization, visuospatial/visuomotor skills, and concept of time. Child draws clock hands or reads analog clocks. Integrates multiple cognitive demands.
Design Fluency
DF
5โ12
Generative fluency, initiation, and cognitive flexibility. Child generates unique designs within a time limit by connecting dots in two arrays (structured and random).
Inhibition โ Naming
IN
5โ16
Automatic naming speed (naming condition). Child names shapes or arrows as quickly as possible. Baseline for inhibitory control. Low scores = slow processing or naming difficulty.
Inhibition โ Inhibition
II
5โ16
Inhibit automatic responses in favor of novel responses (inhibition condition). Child provides an alternate response (opposite of what they see). Low scores = poor inhibitory control.
Inhibition โ Switching
IS
5โ16
Inhibitory control with cognitive flexibility (switching condition). Child alternates between naming and inhibitory responses. Low scores = poor flexibility and inhibitory control.
Word Generation โ Semantic
WG
3โ16
Verbal productivity; generate words by semantic category within 60 seconds. Measures language production initiation, executive control, and semantic knowledge.
Word Generation โ Initial Letter
WG
3โ16
Verbal productivity; generate words by initial letter within 60 seconds. More phonologically demanding than semantic condition; measures executive control of language.
Statue (EC)
ST
3โ6
Motor persistence and inhibition. Child maintains a body position with eyes closed for 75 seconds while inhibiting response to sound distractors. Preschool inhibitory control measure.
Interpretation note: Low scores in this domain warrant investigation of whether deficits are primarily in simple attention vs. more complex self-monitoring (EF). Children with A&EF difficulties may find the NEPSY-II motivating โ classroom demands are greater. Supplement with teacher/parent interviews and classroom observations.
Subtest
Abbr
Ages
What It Measures
Body Part Naming & Identification
BPN/BPI
3โ4
Confrontation naming and name recognition. Naming items = expressive language/word finding; Identification items = receptive semantic knowledge. Early childhood language measure.
Comprehension of Instructions
CI
3โ16
Receive, process, and execute oral instructions of increasing syntactic complexity. Child points to stimuli in response to oral commands. Measures receptive language and working memory for language.
Oromotor Sequences
OS
3โ12
Oromotor coordination and programming for speech production. Child repeats articulatory sequences until the required number of repetitions is reached. Distinct from language comprehension/production.
Phonological Processing
PH
3โ16
Two phonological tasks: Word Segment Recognition (identify words from segments) and Phonological Segmentation (elision at syllable and phoneme levels). Directly relevant to reading/spelling difficulty.
Repetition of Nonsense Words
RN
5โ12
Phonological encoding/decoding and articulation. Child repeats nonsense words presented aloud. Measures ability to analyze and produce phonological forms; sensitive to language learning difficulties.
Speeded Naming
SN
3โ16
Rapid semantic access and production for colors, shapes, sizes, letters, or numbers. Child names an array as quickly as possible. Measures automaticity of lexical access (RAN analog).
Word Generation
WG
3โ16
Verbal productivity by semantic category or initial letter (60 seconds each). Shared with A&EF domain โ classified here when language output is the primary referral concern.
Interpretation note: Language deficits often co-occur across cognitive domains (working memory, attention, verbal learning). Visual tasks that appear non-language-based (e.g., Animal Sorting) are often mediated through language. Low Language domain scores should prompt investigation of whether behavior or attention concerns are secondary to language difficulty.
Subtest
Abbr
Ages
What It Measures
List Memory
LM
7โ12
Verbal learning, rate of learning, and interference effects. Word list read multiple times; child recalls after each presentation. Assesses encoding, supraspan learning, and susceptibility to interference.
List Memory Delayed
LMD
7โ12
Long-term verbal memory retention. Administered 25โ35 minutes after List Memory. Delayed recall lower than immediate recall suggests consolidation/retrieval concerns.
Memory for Designs
MD
3โ16
Spatial memory for novel visual material. Child selects designs from a set of cards and places them on a grid matching a previously shown stimulus. Immediate visuospatial memory.
Memory for Designs Delayed
MDD
5โ16
Long-term visuospatial memory. Same procedure as MD administered after a delay. Compare to immediate recall to assess consolidation.
Memory for Faces
MF
5โ16
Encoding and recognition of facial features. Child views faces and selects them later from a recognition array. Sensitive to social perception deficits; relevant in autism evaluations.
Memory for Faces Delayed
MFD
5โ16
Long-term facial memory. Same recognition procedure after a delay. Compare to MF to assess consolidation of social-perceptual information.
Memory for Names
MN
5โ16
Learn names of children over three trials. Cards with drawings of children shown while names are read. Child recalls the name on each card. Assesses name-face associative learning.
Memory for Names Delayed
MND
5โ16
Long-term retention of name-face associations learned in MN. Administered after a 25โ35 minute delay. Consolidation of associative verbal-visual learning.
Narrative Memory
NM
3โ16
Memory for organized verbal material under free recall, cued recall, and recognition conditions. Child listens to a story and retells it. Children with language difficulties perform poorly here.
Sentence Repetition
SR
3โ6
Immediate verbal memory for sentences of increasing complexity and length. Preschool measure; assesses phonological working memory within syntactic structure.
Word List Interference
WI
7โ16
Verbal working memory, repetition, and word recall following interference. Two word series presented; child repeats each series, then recalls the original series after an interfering series. Sensitive to working memory capacity.
Subtest
Abbr
Ages
What It Measures
Fingertip Tapping โ Dominant
FT
5โ16
Finger dexterity and motor speed (dominant hand). Part 1 assesses motor speed; Part 2 assesses rapid motor programming via copying finger sequences demonstrated by the examiner.
Fingertip Tapping โ Nondominant
FT
5โ16
Same procedure using the nondominant hand. Compare to dominant hand to identify lateralized motor difficulties. Relevant in dysgraphia evaluations.
Imitating Hand Positions
IH
3โ12
Imitate hand and finger positions demonstrated by the examiner. Measures sensorimotor integration and manual motor coordination, distinct from social perception imitation concerns.
Manual Motor Sequences
MM
3โ12
Imitate rhythmic hand movement sequences. Child repeats series of hand movements until the required number is completed. Assesses motor programming and procedural learning.
Visuomotor Precision
VP
3โ12
Graphomotor speed and accuracy. Child draws lines inside tracks as quickly as possible using preferred hand. Directly relevant to handwriting concerns; assess completion time and errors separately.
Note: Visuomotor Precision is particularly relevant in dysgraphia evaluations as a measure of graphomotor speed and accuracy. Consider alongside handwriting observations, Design Copying (Visuospatial domain), and fine-motor history.
Subtest
Abbr
Ages
What It Measures
Affect Recognition
AR
3โ16
Recognize and identify emotional states from photographs of children's faces (happy, sad, anger, fear, disgust, neutral) across four tasks. Sensitive to autism spectrum and social perception deficits.
Theory of Mind โ Verbal
TM
3โ16
Verbal ToM: understand belief, intention, deception, emotion, imagination, and pretending. Child answers questions about scenarios or pictures requiring perspective-taking. First of two ToM conditions.
Theory of Mind โ Contextual
TM
3โ16
Contextual ToM: identify the appropriate affect of a person in a picture depicting a social context, selecting from four photographs. Requires integration of context with emotional understanding.
AU evaluation note: Primary processes in social delays/impairments: Affect Recognition, Inhibition, Theory of Mind, and Cognitive Flexibility. Deficits here should be interpreted in context of the full AU eligibility picture (ADOS-2, parent/teacher rating scales, behavioral observations) โ not in isolation.
Subtest
Abbr
Ages
What It Measures
Arrows
AW
5โ16
Judge line orientation. Child identifies which arrow in an array points to the center of a target. Measures visuospatial judgment without motor demands.
Block Construction
BC
3โ16
Visuospatial and visuomotor ability to reproduce 3D constructions from models or 2D drawings. Timed. Integrates visual analysis with manual construction.
Design Copying
DC
3โ16
Copy 2D geometric figures. Motor and visual-perceptual skills. Relevant in dysgraphia evaluations alongside Visuomotor Precision; compare to assess motor vs. perceptual contributions.
Geometric Puzzles
GP
3โ16
Mental rotation, visuospatial analysis, attention to detail. Child matches shapes outside a grid to shapes within it. No motor demands โ pure visuospatial perception and reasoning.
Picture Puzzles
PP
7โ16
Visual discrimination, spatial localization, and visual scanning. Large picture divided by a grid; child identifies where smaller sections come from. Part-whole relationships and visual search.
Route Finding
RF
5โ12
Visual-spatial relations and directionality. Child finds a target house in a schematic map using a simpler route map. Measures spatial navigation and transfer of spatial information.
Subtest Interpretation Hypotheses
Domain structure organized consistent with the A&EF and Language domains in the NEPSY-II. Descriptions below are paraphrased summaries for professional reference โ always integrate with the full evaluation picture, ecological data, and the official NEPSY-II manual (Korkman, Kirk & Kemp, 2007, Pearson).
Low Score
Interpretation Hypothesis
Animal Sorting
Poor initiation, cognitive flexibility, and self-monitoring; or poor conceptual reasoning or semantic knowledge
Auditory Attention
Poor selective and sustained attention; may indicate slow responding or poor inhibition
Response Set
Poor selective and sustained attention and inhibition; poor working memory; may indicate slow response speed
Clocks
Poor planning and organization, clock drawing or clock reading ability, or visuospatial skills
Design Fluency
Impaired initiation and productivity; poor cognitive flexibility
Inhibition โ Naming (slow time + few errors)
Slow psychomotor speed or a specific problem related to accessing semantic information
Inhibition โ Naming (slow time + high errors)
Naming problem or poor self-monitoring
Inhibition โ Inhibition (slow + few errors)
Inhibitory demands slow down cognitive processing speed
Inhibition โ Inhibition (slow + high errors)
Impulsive response style with poorly controlled output
Inhibition โ Switching (slow + few errors)
Cognitive processing is slowed by switching demands
Inhibition โ Switching (slow + high errors)
Switching demands result in poor inhibition and impulsive approach; problems with cognitive flexibility
Poor word finding, expressive language, or vocabulary
Body Part Identification
Poorly developed semantic knowledge (general or specific to body parts)
Comprehension of Instructions
Poor linguistic or syntactic knowledge and ability to follow multistep commands
Oromotor Sequences
Poor motor programming for speech production
Phonological Processing
Poor phonological awareness and processing
Repetition of Nonsense Words
Poor ability to analyze or produce words phonologically, or to articulate novel words
Speeded Naming
Poor automaticity of lexical access; slow processing speed; or poor naming ability
Word Generation (Semantic or Initial Letter)
Poor executive control of language production; or poor initiative and ideation
Referral Battery Guide
Select subtests based on age, referral question, and time constraints. These referral batteries represent starting points โ not required sets.
General Referral
Clinically sensitive subtests across all domains except Social Perception. Used when problem is vague or involves multiple issues.
~45 min (3โ4 yr) ยท ~75 min (5โ16 yr)
Learning Differences โ Reading
Phonological processing, speeded naming, working memory, verbal learning, attention, and executive functions. Differentiates reading disorder from math and language disorders.
~40 min (3โ4 yr) ยท ~80 min (5โ16 yr)
Learning Differences โ Mathematics
Attention, executive functions, visual-perceptual skills, visual memory, and working memory. Differentiates math disorder from reading disorder.
~45 min (3โ4 yr) ยท ~90 min (5โ16 yr)
Attention / Concentration
Most sensitive tests for ADHD: attention, executive functioning, and general processing speed. Relevant to OHI eligibility evaluations.
~40 min (3โ4 yr) ยท ~75 min (5โ16 yr)
Behavior Management (ED)
Cognitive flexibility, impulse control, language skills, and social perception. Used when considering Emotionally Disturbed eligibility.
~35 min (3โ4 yr) ยท ~75 min (5โ16 yr)
Language Delays / Disorders
Language comprehension and production, articulation, working memory, and verbal memory. Used with language referral history.
Social perception, language, EF, visuospatial skills, fine motor, and memory. Designed to differentiate autism/Asperger's from controls.
~75 min (3โ4 yr) ยท ~125 min (5โ16 yr)
School Readiness (Ages 3โ6)
Early language skills, fine-motor control, visuomotor construction, and executive functioning. For Pre-K/K cognitive delay screening.
~60 min (3โ6 yr only)
Reference: Korkman, M., Kirk, U., & Kemp, S. (2007). NEPSY-II: A Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson/PsychCorp. Subtest descriptions on this page are paraphrased summaries for professional reference by educational diagnosticians, grounded in the NEPSY-II domain framework. Consult the official NEPSY-II Clinical and Interpretive Manual (Korkman, Kirk & Kemp, 2007, Pearson/PsychCorp) for complete administration, scoring, and normative interpretation guidance. Barber Sped Hub is an independent diagnostic reference and is not affiliated with or endorsed by Pearson.
Reference Note: Subtest descriptions on this page are paraphrased for professional reference and are not verbatim from the NEPSY-II Clinical and Interpretive Manual (Korkman, Kirk & Kemp, 2007). Always consult the official manual for standardized administration, scoring, and interpretive guidance. Eligibility determinations must be made by a qualified multidisciplinary ARD team. Barber Sped Hub is an independent diagnostic reference and is not affiliated with or endorsed by Pearson/PsychCorp or any test publisher.